I want to say, "This is the most corrupt thing I've ever seen our government do," except that I feel like I say that way too frequently for that to ever be true.
I don't know all the rules. I don't know the Constitution by heart. I don't know exactly what the "requirements" were for Scott Walker to get that money. However, one would imagine that if money is given to a government to perform a certain task, that money ought to be revoked if spent otherwise, and that the member of government responsible for the decision be penalized.
Can someone explain to me exactly how this is legal?
No comments:
Post a Comment